Author: Admin

  • Lilo & Stitch Review: Heartfelt Moments Can’t Rescue This Remake

    Lilo & Stitch Review: Heartfelt Moments Can’t Rescue This Remake

    Disney’s live-action remake of Lilo & Stitch, directed by Dean Fleischer Camp (Marcel the Shell with Shoes On) and co-written by Chris Kekaniokalani Bright and Mike Van Waes, arrives in 2025 with both curiosity and trepidation attached. A hybrid of live-action and animation, this reimagining of the 2002 animated cult classic attempts to balance heartfelt storytelling with CGI spectacle, but the result is a film that feels mostly unnecessary. Despite its sincere lead performance and occasional emotional clarity, Lilo & Stitch is ultimately a two-star disappointment weighed down by awkward visuals, an over-sanitized tone, and the absence of key characters that made the original so rich.

    A Familiar Tale, Lightly Retouched:

    The narrative remains largely intact: a young Hawaiian girl named Lilo (played by newcomer Maia Kealoha) adopts what she believes to be a dog, only to discover that her new pet—Stitch—is a destructive alien fugitive. As intergalactic authorities chase Stitch across the islands, Lilo and her older sister Nani (Sydney Elizebeth Agudong) try to hold their small, fragile family together, all while being watched by social worker Cobra Bubbles (Courtney B. Vance). Lilo teaches Stitch about ‘ohana—family—and in doing so, both find something they didn’t know they were missing.

    But this 2025 version doesn’t add enough meaningful new material to justify its existence. Rather than expand or evolve the story for modern audiences, the remake plays it safe, delivering a slightly neutered, less spontaneous version of the original narrative, with fewer teeth, fewer stakes, and less personality.

    Stitch in the Flesh (and Fur):

    One of the few elements that works resoundingly well is Stitch’s live-action redesign. Rendered through CGI but textured with tangible fur, the character walks a fine line between cartoony charm and believable presence. Chris Sanders once again voices the genetically engineered alien, bringing the same mischief and raspy exuberance that made Stitch so iconic over two decades ago. His voice performance remains a delight and acts as an anchor to the original’s spirit.

    However, Stitch’s animation is one of the few CGI successes. The rest of the effects vary wildly in quality. Other alien characters—especially Dr. Jumba Jookiba (played by a game but underserved Zach Galifianakis)—often look uncanny, jarring, and poorly integrated with their human co-stars. The environments feel flatly lit and heavily reliant on green screen, sapping the film of the sun-drenched warmth and lived-in beauty of the animated original’s watercolor-inspired Hawaii. While Stitch pops visually, the film’s broader aesthetic feels like a downgrade.

    The Cast and Their Challenges:

    Maia Kealoha gives a heartfelt and sincere performance as Lilo. She captures the strange, offbeat, and emotional tone of the character with quiet precision. Her moments of loneliness and fierce loyalty shine, and she manages to carry much of the film on her young shoulders. Sydney Elizebeth Agudong as Nani tries her best, but the film flattens her character, reducing the chaos and pressure that once made Nani so compelling to a more generalized “worried older sister” archetype. Their sisterly bond is undercooked, lacking the gritty realism and tension of the original.

    Courtney B. Vance brings gravitas to Cobra Bubbles, though his screen time is limited, and his lines feel more perfunctory than layered. Zach Galifianakis’s Dr. Jumba veers into broad comic relief, but the tonal tightrope he walks often leads to misfires—his menace is diminished, and his banter with Stitch lacks the offbeat energy of his animated predecessor.

    What’s Missing Hurts:

    Perhaps the most glaring omission is Captain Gantu, the towering alien enforcer from the original film. His absence removes a key layer of tension and a memorable antagonist dynamic from the story. With no real threat pursuing Stitch (beyond vague gestures from Jumba and the Galactic Federation), the stakes feel murky and unconvincing. The film also simplifies or omits other quirky supporting characters who once helped flesh out Lilo’s world. What’s left is a leaner, more emotionally generic narrative that undercuts the off-kilter personality that gave the 2002 version such staying power.

    Moreover, the setting feels oddly detached from its Hawaiian cultural roots. While there is effort in casting and including Hawaiian language and touches, the film’s tone leans more globalized and sanitized than culturally specific. Unlike the original, which leaned into the rhythms, textures, and realities of island life, the live-action version flirts with depth but rarely dives in. It gestures at cultural respect without embodying it.

    A Question of Purpose:

    More than anything, Lilo & Stitch struggles with the existential question plaguing so many of Disney’s recent remakes: why does this movie exist? The 2002 version was a modest, charming oddity in Disney’s catalog—a story with heart, quirk, and real emotional weight that resonated with kids and adults alike. It didn’t cry out for a sleek update, and certainly not one that smooths over the idiosyncrasies in favor of a more conventional family adventure.

    This remake doesn’t desecrate its source material, but it doesn’t enhance it either. It plays like a cautious echo of a louder, bolder, and more sincere film—one whose hand-drawn imperfections and unorthodox charm are replaced with digital polish and broader beats. The result feels like a simulacrum: competent, but emotionally hollow.

    Overall:

    There are moments in Lilo & Stitch that hint at what this remake could have been. Some scenes between Lilo and Stitch do tug at the heartstrings, and the core message of found family still resonates. But those moments are islands in a sea of awkward CGI, uninspired scripting, and a nagging sense of corporate redundancy.

    Disney’s obsession with retooling its animated catalog into live-action showcases has yielded a mixed bag, and Lilo & Stitch falls toward the bottom of that spectrum. It has some heart, but it lacks the weirdness, specificity, and soul that made the original so beloved. Stitch may have crash-landed in Hawaii again, but this time, the landing doesn’t stick.

  • Mission Impossible The Final Reckoning Review: Tom Cruise Does It Again

    Mission Impossible The Final Reckoning Review: Tom Cruise Does It Again

    Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning brings the long-running franchise to a thunderous, high-octane conclusion. Ethan Hunt is once again thrust into a globe-spanning mission where the stakes feel impossibly high. As a mysterious new threat connected to his past begins to unravel everything he’s fought for, Ethan and his team must confront enemies both human and digital while racing against time. Packed with adrenaline, loaded with callbacks, and anchored by Cruise’s relentless energy, this finale delivers exactly what audiences come to see—danger, heart, and spectacle.

    Mission: Impossible The Final Reckoning Trailer:

    Mission: Impossible The Final Reckoning Review:

    The Good:

    Let’s talk about the best thing in this film. The stunts are next-level.  Every single one feels more intense than the last. Knowing that Tom Cruise is actually performing these sequences gives each moment a layer of real-world tension you can feel. The underwater scene was so immersive that I caught myself holding my breath.  It was heart-pounding from start to finish. The sense of uncertainty, paired with the technical execution, creates a rare kind of cinematic tension.

    Then there’s the plane sequence in the final act. Cruise doesn’t just do the stunt. He turns a single moment of danger into something unforgettable. It is thrilling, emotional, and totally earned.

    The cinematography and editing during the fight scenes deserve serious praise. One scene in particular, where two fights unfold at the same time, feels like a high-energy dance. The sharp editing paired with a perfectly synced soundtrack keeps the adrenaline pumping without ever missing a beat.

    This film had a great ensemble cast. Everyone delivered a great performance, even if their role was a bit more limited. I thought the core of Ethan’s team had good on-screen chemistry and certainly want to root for them to succeed.

    And the story finally gives fans a sense of closure. Without spoiling anything, the way the film ties together threads from past entries is genuinely rewarding. You don’t need to binge every prior installment to follow along, but if you have, you’ll feel the payoff. The use of flashbacks and small reveals helps deepen the impact without ever overwhelming the present story. It’s satisfying and on point.

    The Bad:

    Where the film starts to stumble is with its pacing and repetition. Some dialogue scenes drag, particularly when the script gets too caught up in explaining the mission’s stakes. Characters keep reiterating how “only Ethan Hunt can do this,” or “the world is at stake,” which starts to feel less like storytelling and more like a tribute reel. We get it. Ethan is the guy. Let the action show us that instead.

    Another letdown is how the film handles its side characters. Ving Rhames’ Luther feels like a mere plot device for Ethan Hunt. Some characters show up out of nowhere or disappear without explanation, making certain scenes feel disjointed. That’s likely more of an editing issue, but it affected the flow of the film to me.

    As for the villains, Gabriel and The Entity, they don’t hit as hard as they should. In the previous film, the villains were always one step ahead, making Ethan’s victories feel earned. Here, the threat feels too passive, and they feel restricted in some ways. It may have been more effective to allow the villains to be as bad as they could reasonably be and then have Ethan rise to the occasion to save the day.

    The Verdict:

    Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning is the kind of blockbuster spectacle that demands to be seen on the big screen despite having a few bumps along the way. Tom Cruise delivers another jaw-dropping performance, cementing himself as one of the greatest action stars of all time. While the film has its flaws—uneven pacing, heavy exposition, and underutilized villains—it still manages to entertain at the highest level.

    I think this film went down a similar path as the Fast and Furios franchise. The same way those films left racing behind, this felt like it did the same with the espionage and leaned more into the crazy stunts and action. Luckily the stunts weren’t eye rolling and unbelievable. Given the stunts alone, this is a cinematic experience. And while this may not be the most perfect entry in the series, it absolutely earns its place among the franchise’s best. See it in IMAX. See it in Dolby. No matter what, see it on the biggest screen you can.

    Director: Christopher McQuarrie
    Writer(s): Bruce Geller, Erik Jendresen, Christopher McQuarrie
    Stars: Tom Cruise, Hayley Atwell, Ving Rhames, Simon Pegg, Esai Morales, Pom Klementieff, Henry Czerny, Holt McCallany, Janet McTeer, Nick Offerman, Hannah Waddingham, Tramell Tillman and Angela Bassett, Shea Whigham, Greg Tarzan Davis, Charles Parnell, Mark Gatiss, with Rolf Saxon, Lucy Tulugarjuk
    Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning comes to theaters May 23rd, 2025.